In recent years, the question of why we haven’t discovered signs of intelligent life elsewhere in the Milky Way has become increasingly pressing. With over 100 billion stars in our galaxy, many of which host planets within the habitable zone, the odds of encountering life should be substantial. This paradox—known as the Fermi Paradox—has sparked speculation.
One of the most compelling explanations is the Great Filter Hypothesis, which suggests that in the development of any intelligent society, there exists a critical barrier, a “bottleneck” that few, if any, civilizations manage to pass. If we look at our own world, perhaps it’s the energy crisis we are currently facing that represents this filter.
Fusion technology: A civilizational bottleneck
Today, humanity stands on the edge of an energy crisis that’s not only about resources but also about the future of our planet. The fossil fuels we have relied on to build our progress are causing a climate and biodiversity crisis that could threaten our very existence. Many are turning to solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources, but one technology stands out as the ultimate answer: fusion.
Fusion, the process that powers the sun and stars, could grant us access to nearly unlimited, clean energy without the dangers and waste associated with nuclear fission. Successfully implementing fusion technology would be a game-changer for civilization. We would no longer be limited by scarce resources, and the most urgent problems we face today—climate change, energy imbalances, and environmental degradation—would become far more manageable. In a fusion-powered society, we could sustain our technological and economic progress while living in harmony with the planet.
But fusion is still decades away from becoming commercially viable. Despite significant progress in research, fusion remains a colossal technical and economic challenge that isn’t ready to be scaled. ITER, the world’s largest experimental fusion project, is a crucial step forward, but the question remains: can we solve fusion’s puzzles and create sustainable solutions before we reach a critical decline in our current economic and ecological systems?
The Great Filter Hypothesis: Why We Don’t See Other Civilizations
If fusion holds the key to a sustainable future, we might start to wonder if this is where many other civilizations in the universe met their demise. The Great Filter Hypothesis posits that all advanced civilizations face one or more existential tests they must pass in order to survive long-term. One of the most likely challenges is energy consumption. Just as we face an energy crisis today, many other civilizations may have failed to develop sustainable energy sources and thus perished.
Astrophysicist Adam Frank echoes this notion in his book, The Little Book of Aliens, where he suggests that civilizations often face an existential bottleneck related to their energy use. He points out that managing energy consumption sustainably is a critical test for the survival of any advanced society. If a civilization fails to balance technological advancement with environmental sustainability, it risks collapse long before it can engage in interstellar communication or travel.
“Civilizations, like ours, face existential tests tied to their energy consumption. If we fail to manage this resource sustainably, we could doom ourselves to collapse, as perhaps many before us have.”
[Frank, The Little Book of Aliens, 2023, Harper Collins Publishers]
This idea strongly aligns with the argument that fusion technology might be humanity’s best chance of passing through this filter. Without mastering our energy consumption, we risk following the same path of potential extinction as other civilizations that may have once existed but failed to reach a sustainable future.
Betting on what we don’t have: Are we all doomed to the same fate?
Right now, we are effectively betting on what we don’t have yet. We look ahead to fusion and other advanced technologies, but they remain elusive, not yet within our grasp. We hope these technologies could swoop down and revolutionize how we consume energy—but we cannot be certain when, or even if, that will happen.
In the meantime, we are forced to confront what’s directly in front of us. We cannot afford to place all our hopes on technologies that don’t yet exist while continuing to live as though nothing is at stake. We can’t gamble everything on what we don’t have.
The situation demands that we start with what we can control: our consumption habits. Whether fusion becomes a reality or not, we cannot continue down the current path of overconsumption, unchecked growth, and increasing strain on our ecosystems. There is no escaping the fact that, as individuals and as a society, we must significantly change our lifestyle. Technology alone won’t save us if we aren’t willing to shift the way we consume.
A moral obligation: Developing technology and changing patterns of consumption
We have a moral obligation to pursue technologies like fusion and work toward making them a reality. There’s no question that we must invest heavily in research and development that can bring us closer to a sustainable future. But just as important is the need to look inward and recognize our responsibility in adapting our lifestyles to the realities we face right now.
This isn’t about waiting for technology, but about taking responsibility for our patterns of consumption today. We cannot continue living in excess and overconsumption, hoping for a technological breakthrough to arrive and save the day. Until then, we must do the hard work of reducing our energy consumption, finding smarter ways to live, and fostering a culture that doesn’t rely on constant growth.
So while fusion may one day be part of the solution, we cannot afford to sit back and wait. We must take action based on the choices we can make today, not gamble everything on what’s yet to come.
eudaimon.dk 
Leave a comment